Allowed

Sarvind Rai v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Jul 2024CR. MISC./37043/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act following recovery of 191.170 litres of illicit foreign liquor from behind the petitioner's house. The court considered the period of custody and enlarged the petitioner on bail with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each.

Sarvind Rai Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37043 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-917 Year-2023 Thana- FATUA District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sarvind Rai S/o Harvansh Rai R/o Village Raipura Ward No 24, P.s. - Fatuha, Distt. - Patna

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Parmeshwar Vishwakarma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nand Kumar ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 04-07-2024

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

¶15

2 . The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Fatuha P.S. Case No. 917 of 2023 dated 30.12.2023 registered for the offence/s punishable u/s 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶16

3 . As per the prosecution case, total 191.170 litres of illicit foreign liquor was recovered from the toilet situated behind the house of the petitioner.

¶17

4 . Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The said recovery was made from an open place that is accessible to anyone. The petitioner has no concern with the

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37043 of 2024(2) dt.04-07-2024 2/2

¶19

alleged recovery. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 17.03.2024.

¶20

5 . Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

¶21

6 . Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Patna City in connection with Fatuha P.S. Case No. 917 of 2023.

¶22

7 . The application stands allowed.

¶23

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶24

guddukr/-

¶25

U T

Sarvind Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sarvind Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suraj Bharti Vs The State of Bihar

Naushad Alam Vs the State of Bihar

Brahamdeo Mistry @ Brahmdev Vishwakarma Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Bilal Alam @ Md. Bilal Vs The State of Bihar

Vinod @ Vinod Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Dharamvir Ram Vs The State of Bihar