Allowed

Shital Yadav @ Shital Prasad Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC26 Jun 2024CR. MISC./36779/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail application in an FIR alleging assault of the informant and family members under various IPC sections. Finding no specific overt act against the petitioners and noting a claimed compromise, the court granted anticipatory bail subject to Cr.P.C. Section 438(2) conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners to be released on bail on arrest or surrender within six weeks, on Rs. 25,000 bail bond each with two like sureties, subject to Section 438(2), Cr.P.C.

Shital Yadav @ Shital Prasad Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36779 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-377 Year-2023 Thana- BABUBARHI District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Shital Yadav @ Shital Prasad Yadav son of Late Lakshmi Yadav villageMadandobh Ps- Babubarhi Dist- Madhubani

¶5

Gayatri Devi @ Sakali Devi wife of Shital Yadav @ Shital Prasad Yadav village- Madandobh Ps- Babubarhi Dist- Madhubani

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 26-06-2024 Heard the parties.

¶13

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

As per the FIR, the allegation against the petitioners is that they and other co-accused persons assaulted the informant and his family members due to which they sustained injuries.

¶15

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. There is no specific overt act against the petitioners and the matter has been compromised between the parties. Petitioners have no criminal

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36779 of 2024(2) dt.26-06-2024 2/2

¶17

antecedent.

¶18

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶19

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as there is no specific overt act against the petitioners, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Babubarhi P.S. Case No.377 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶20

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶21

shikha/-

¶22

U T

Shital Yadav @ Shital Prasad Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shital Yadav @ Shital Prasad Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Archana Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Suman Kumari @ Suman Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Smita Kumari, Vs The State of Bihar

Sudhir Mandal @ Sudhir Kumar Mandal @ Sudhir Kumar @ Sudhir Kumar Mahto Vs the State of Bihar

Manna Lal Mahto @ Mana Lal Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Rana Kumar Vs The State of Bihar