The High Court of Patna rejected a modification application in the CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74555 of 2022 case. The court affirmed a consistent view not to extend the surrender period for accused granted anticipatory bail if they fail to surrender within time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35901 of 2024
In
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74555 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-17 Year-2021 Thana- HAYAGHAT District- Darbhanga
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kedar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER
the period of surrender, in the event, if the accused has not surrendered within the time stipulated, while granting anticipatory bail.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
amit/-
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to modify the anticipatory bail order to extend the period of surrender.
Whether to insist on surrender within the stipulated time for those granted anticipatory bail in consistent view.
Sona Devi
Sushil Yadav
The State of Bihar
SATYAVRAT VERMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
