Allowed

Shakhichand Ram @ Shakhichandra Ram v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC2 Sept 2024CR. MISC./32620/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 465, and 471 IPC related to forged documents for compassionate appointment. The bail was allowed subject to a bond and conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner be enlarged on bail on surrender within eight weeks by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties under Section 438(2) CrPC.

Shakhichand Ram @ Shakhichandra Ram Vs The… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32620 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-534 Year-2022 Thana- UDWANTNAGAR District- Bhojpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Shakhichand Ram @ Shakhichandra Ram S/o Late Jagnarayan Ram R/o Village -Bampali, P.O.-Bampali, P.S.-Udwant nagar, District-Bhojpur

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Fahimuddin, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶10

4 02-09-2024

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

A.P.P. for the State.

¶13

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 420, 467, 465 & 471 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

The petitioner is alleged to have obtained appointment, on compassionate ground, on the basis of forged and fabricated document(s).

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that after thorough verification of the relevant documents by the competent authority, the petitioner was appointed on compassionate ground, but later on, same has been declared as forged and fabricated without proper

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32620 of 2024(4) dt.02-09-2024 2/2

¶17

verification or giving any notice to the petitioner. Moreover, petitioner has already been terminated from service, vide office order contained in Memo No. 917 dated 29^th April, 2022, issued by District Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara. Petitioner has got clean antecedent.

¶18

Learned counsel for the Vigilance Department vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶19

Considering the fact that petitioner has already been terminated from the service and he has got clean antecedent, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District & Sessions Judge – II, Bhojpur, Ara in connection with Udwant Nagar (Gajrajganj) P.S. Case No. 534 of 2022, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶20

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶21

anay

¶22

U T

Shakhichand Ram @ Shakhichandra Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shakhichand Ram @ Shakhichandra Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raja Babu Sah @ Raja Sah Vs the State of Bihar

Lalan Jha @ Neeraj Kumar Bedhaw Vs the State of Bihar

Indrajeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Amritesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Abhishek Paswan @ Abhishek Vs The State of Bihar

Ravi Kumar Vs The State of Bihar