Allowed

Prabhash Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Jan 2024CR. MISC./32577/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail application concerning allegations of unlawful assembly, abuse and firing at an informant causing elbow injury. Petitioners claimed false implication and omnibus allegations. The court permitted arrested petitioners to withdraw and granted anticipatory bail to the rest on bail bonds with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- each with two sureties of like amount, subject to Section 438(2) CrPC conditions.

Prabhash Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32577 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-175 Year-2022 Thana- CHAUTHAM District- Khagaria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Prabhash Yadav Son Of Shyamsundar Yadav R/O Vill.- Sonbarsa, P.S.Chautham, Distt.- Khagaria

¶5

Mantun Yadav Son Of Upendra Yadav R/O Vill.- Sonbarsa, P.S.- Chautham, Distt.- Khagaria

¶6

Bhola Singh Yadav @ Mulayam Singh Son Of Sikandar Yadav R/O Vill.Sonbarsa, P.S.- Chautham, Distt.- Khagaria

¶7

Jawala Yadav Son Of Sikandar Yadav R/O Vill.- Sonbarsa, P.S.- Chautham, Distt.- Khagaria

¶8

Bipin Yadav Son Of Sikandar Yadav R/O Vill.- Sonbarsa, P.S.- Chautham, Distt.- Khagaria

¶9

Lalan Yadav Son Of Yogi Yadav R/O Vill.- Sonbarsa, P.S.- Chautham, Distt.Khagaria

¶10

Mohan Yadav Son Of Late Shankar Yadav R/O Vill.- Sonbarsa, P.S.Chautham, Distt.- Khagaria

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶15

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ranjeet Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anant Kumar 1, APP For the Informant/s : Mr. Santosh Kr. Singh, Advocate

¶16

======================================================

¶17

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶18

ORAL ORDER

¶19

3 08-01-2024 Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to

¶20

remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of three weeks from today.

¶21

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

¶22

learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶23

3 . Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner no. 2, 3 and 7 have been arrested. Accordingly, he

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32577 of 2023(3) dt.08-01-2024 2/3

¶25

seeks permission to withdraw the present application.

¶26

4 . Permission is accorded.

¶27

5. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed as

¶28

withdrawn.

¶29

6. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Chautham P.S. Case No. 175 of 2022 dated 02.07.2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶30

7. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners and the co-accused persons holding deadly weapons formed unlawful assembly at the agricultural field of the informant and abused him. They also fired on him indiscriminately due to which he sustained injury on the elbow

¶31

8. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. Learned counsel has further submitted that the injury is not mentioned in the case diary. It is further submitted that the injury is on non-vital part of the body. The petitioner no. 1 and 4 are accused in one more criminal case whereas the petitioner no. 5 and 6 are accused in two other criminal cases as stated in para

¶32

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32577 of 2023(3) dt.08-01-2024 3/3

¶33

3 of the bail petition.

¶34

9. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

¶35

10. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Khagaria in connection with Chautham P.S. Case No. 175 of 2022, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶36

11. This application stands allowed.

¶37

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶38

atul/-

¶39

U T

Prabhash Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prabhash Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vinod Prasad Singh @ Vinod Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Rohit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Manoj Kumar Pandey @ Manoj Pandey @ Mintu Pandey Vs The State of Bihar

Anil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Jayaur Rahman Vs The State of Bihar

Nafis Ahmad @ Nafis Ahmad Hasmi Vs The State of Bihar