Disposed

Niraj Singh @ Niraj Kumar Singh v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Sept 2024CR. MISC./31563/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Second regular bail petition in a case under Sections 489(B) and 489(C) IPC. With all nine witnesses examined, the court directed conclusion of the trial within six months and granted liberty to renew the bail prayer after nine months if the trial remained unconcluded.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to renew bail prayer after nine months if trial not concluded; trial to be concluded within six months.

Niraj Singh @ Niraj Kumar Singh Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31563 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2022 Thana- MOTIPUR District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

NIRAJ SINGH @ NIRAJ KUMAR SINGH SON OF KHEDAN SINGH @ SURYADEV SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - CHAUKARA, P.S. - KOPA, DISTRICT - SARAN AT CHAPRA

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shubhesh Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶11

4 20-09-2024

¶12

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

¶13

The present petition is by way of second attempt at the behest of the petitioner for grant of regular bail in connection with Motipur P.S. Case No.21 of 2022, registered for the offence punishable under Section 489(B), 489(C) of the Indian Penal Code, inasmuch as the earlier petition filed by the petitioner for grant of bail was rejected by this Court by an order dated 04.02.2023, passed in Cr.Misc.No.58625 of 2022.

¶14

This Court finds from the supplementary show cause, filed by the Senior Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur that all the nine witnesses have been examined

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31563 of 2024(4) dt.20-09-2024 2/2

¶16

and cross-examined, hence this Court finds that there is no impediment in conclusion of the trial at an early date.

¶17

At this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that liberty be granted to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after lapse of nine months from today, in case the trial is not concluded. Liberty so sought is granted.

¶18

It is needless to state that the learned trial Court shall make endeavor to conclude the trial within a period of six months from today.

¶19

The petition stands disposed off on the aforesaid terms.

¶20

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶21

Saurav/-

¶22

U T

Niraj Singh @ Niraj Kumar Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Niraj Singh @ Niraj Kumar Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lallan Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

C and C Construction Ltd. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Suryamukhi Devi Vs Dulari Devi

Sharwan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Wasim Raja Vs The State of Bihar

Badey Lal Sah @ Babu Lal Sah Vs The State of Bihar