Allowed

Vikash Kumar @ Bikash Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC24 Apr 2024CR. MISC./31311/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought bail in a case involving recovery of illicit liquor. The High Court allowed bail subject to furnishing bail bonds, directing release after framing of charges or submission of charge sheet.

What did the court decide?

Bail allowed subject to furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties, release after framing of charges or submission of charge sheet.

Vikash Kumar @ Bikash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31311 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-174 Year-2024 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Vikash Kumar @ Bikash Kumar Son of Munarik @ Murari Yadav Resident of Village - Ganjas, Police Station - Muffasil, District - Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rashmi Sharma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Matloob Rab ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 24-04-2024 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf

¶12

of the parties.

¶13

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No.174 of 2024 registered for the offence

¶14

under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶15

As per FIR, there is recovery of total 150

¶16

litre of illicit liquor from possession of the petitioner.

¶17

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is submitted that recovery of alleged illicit liquor was not made from conscious physical possession of the petitioner and he has no concern with the alleged recovery of illicit liquor. It is submitted that seizure list

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31311 of 2024(2) dt.24-04-2024 2/3

¶19

appears doubtful being not supported by independent witnesses, rather by police personnels. It is further submitted that petitioner is a man of clean antecedent and he is in custody since 25.02.2024.

¶20

Learned APP appearing for the State, opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

¶21

Considering the facts and circumstances and submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail, after framing of the charge , in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No.174 of 2024 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Excise Court No.1, Gaya.

¶22

The trial court is directed to conclude the proceeding of framing of charge according to law within a period of 15 (fifteen) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that if the charge-sheet has not been submitted then the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond with further condition that the petitioner have to present physically on each and every date before the Trial Court till conclusion of the proceeding of

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31311 of 2024(2) dt.24-04-2024 3/3

¶24

framing of charge.

¶25

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)

¶26

S.Katyayan/-

¶27

U T

Vikash Kumar @ Bikash Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikash Kumar @ Bikash Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deependra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Zafran Vs The State of Bihar

Shailendra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Bablu Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Gopal Choudhary @ Prem Sahani Vs The State of Bihar

Pintu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar