Petitioner apprehending arrest in a case involving receipt of money promised for marriage sought bail. Court enlarged him on furnishing bail bond with two sureties, subject to Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30787 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14 Year-2021 Thana- LAKHISARAI District- Lakhisarai
======================================================
Mukesh Kumar Prasad Son of Baijnath Prasad Resident of Village- Koriya Bigha Near Budhauli, District- Nawada at present Resident of Railway Division Lohichak, Chakradharpur, District- Chakradharpur (Jharkhand)
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shaukat Alam For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Dinesh Singh ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, opposite party no. 2 and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30787 of 2024(4) dt.13-12-2024 2/2
the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the petitioner has received Rs. 6,00,000/from the complainant which has already been returned to him. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)
devendra/- U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner apprehending arrest in a cheating/dowry case should be granted anticipatory bail.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Mukesh Kumar Prasad
The State of Bihar
Rambaran Prasad
Anjani Kumar Sharan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
