Dismissed¶24

Ram Ayodhya Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Apr 2024CR. MISC./30621/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court; Cr. Misc. No. 30621 of 2024 (Restoration Application arising out of Cr. Misc. No. 14695 of 2018; PS Case No.-25/2017, Thana SC/ST, Sitamarhi); decided 20-04-2024 by Satyavrat Verma, J. Restoration Application dismissed on the ground that the trial has commenced; the related 2018 petition sought quashing of the cognizance order dated 16.11.2017. Petitioners: Ram Ayodhya Chaudhary and family; Opposite Party: State of Bihar (APP Gulnar Begum); petitioner's counsel Vaidehi Raman Prasad Singh.

What did the court decide?

Since the trial has commenced and Cr. Misc. No. 14695 of 2018 had been filed only to seek quashing of the cognizance order dated 16.11.2017, the Court is not inclined to allow the Restoration Application. ¶20

Ram Ayodhya Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30621 of 2024

¶2

¶3

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14695 of 2018

¶4

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-25 Year-2017 Thana- SC/ST District- Sitamarhi

¶5

======================================================

¶6

Ram Ayodhya Chaudhary Son Of Late Deo Narain Chaudhary Resident Of Village- Dhobaha, Ps- Runni, Saidpur, Dist- Sitamarhi

¶7

Ashok Kumar @ Ashok Chaudhary Son Of Ram Ayodhya Chaudhary Resident Of Village- Dhobaha, Ps- Runni, Saidpur, Dist- Sitamarhi

¶8

Bachchi Devi Wife Of Ram Ayodhya Chaudhary Resident Of VillageDhobaha, Ps- Runni, Saidpur, Dist- Sitamarhi

¶9

Prabhakar Kumar @ Gopi Chaudhary Son Of Manoj Chaudhary Resident Of Village- Dhobaha, Ps- Runni, Saidpur, Dist- Sitamarhi

¶10

Ranjana Kumari @ Ranjana Devi @ Ranjan Devi @ Ranjan Chaudhary Daughter Of Ram Ayodhya Chaudhary Resident Of Village- Dhobaha, PsRunni, Saidpur, Dist- Sitamarhi

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶15

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vaidehi Raman Prasad Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Gulnar Begum, APP. ======================================================

¶16

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶17

2 20-04-2024

¶18

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms.

¶19

Gulnar Begum, learned A.P.P for the State.

¶20

On query of the Court with regard to the stage of the case, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner very fairly submitted that the trial in in progress. Since, the trial has commenced and Cr. Misc. No. 14695 of 2018 was filed seeking quashing of the order dated 16.11.2017 by which cognizance was taken as such the Court is not inclined to allow

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30621 of 2024(2) dt.20-04-2024 2/2

¶22

the Restoration Application.

¶23