Anticipatory bail application in a dacoity case under Section 395 IPC, where the petitioner's name surfaced during investigation via a co-accused's confession and he had six criminal antecedents. The court found it unfit for anticipatory bail and rejected the prayer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29704 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-574 Year-2020 Thana- WAJIRGANJ District- Gaya
======================================================
Dipu Paswan @ Dipu Kumar S/O Anuj Paswan R/O Village- Krit Nawada, P.S- Chandauti, Distt.- Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Gulnar Begum ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER
2 03-07-2024
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
A.P.P. for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29704 of 2024(2) dt.03-07-2024 2/2
the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. but the name of the petitioner has come during the course of investigation on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused, Anuj Paswan. The petitioner has got six criminal antecedents of similar nature as mentioned in para-3 of this application and in the supplementary affidavit,
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)
anand/- U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner apprehending arrest in Wazirganj PS Case No. 574 of 2020 under Section 395 IPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dipu Paswan @ Dipu Kumar
The State Of Bihar
Anjani Kumar Sharan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
