Disposed

Aashu Kumar Upadhya v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC7 May 2024CR. MISC./29552/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in a dowry and IPC offences FIR with ongoing investigation. As offences carried punishment under seven years, the court disposed of the application in terms of an earlier order, allowing representation to the SP/IO who must follow that order's directions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail application disposed in terms of prior order; liberty to file representation before SP/IO within three weeks.

Aashu Kumar Upadhya Vs The State of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29552 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-130 Year-2023 Thana- TURKAULIYA District- East

¶3

Champaran

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Aashu Kumar Upadhya Son of Late Anil Upadhya Resident of VillageLoknathpur, P.S.- Govindganj, Dist.- East Champaran, At present r/s near referral hospital Areraj, P.S.- Areraj, dist.- East Champaran

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhannjay Kumar No 2 For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Shaheen Begum ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 07-05-2024

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

A.P.P. for the State.

¶13

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Turkauliya (Raghunathpur) P.S. Case No. 130 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 498A, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is further submitted that the investigation in the case is still going on.

¶14

The learned APP for the State submits that the offences for which the instant FIR has been instituted against the petitioner carries punishment of less than seven years, the said submission of the learned APP is not disputed by the

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29552 of 2024(2) dt.07-05-2024 2/2

¶16

learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

¶17

In view of the submission made by the learned APP,

¶18

the anticipatory bail application is disposed of in terms of the order dated 13-2-2024 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari Vs. The State of Bihar).

¶19

The petitioner would be at liberty to file a representation before the concerned Superintendent of Police and the Investigating Officer of the case within a period of three weeks from today with a web copy of the order dated 13-2-2024 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari Vs. the state of Bihar) and the concerned Superintendent of Police shall ensure that the Investigating Officer of the case strictly adheres to the directions contained in the the order dated 13-2-2024 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. The State of Bihar).

¶20

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶21

Rishabh/-

¶22

U T

Aashu Kumar Upadhya v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aashu Kumar Upadhya v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramesh Tiwary @ Mintu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Dasharath Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Pranav Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Ramadhar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Nikesh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Ankit Sahay Vs The State of Bihar