Petitioners sought quashing of orders in a Madhubani complaint case but withdrew the application during argument. The court dismissed the application as withdrawn with liberty to raise the points at the framing-of-charge stage.
Application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to contest at charge-framing stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29550 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-773 Year-2016 Thana- MADHUBANI COMPLAINT CASE District- Madhubani
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav Mr. Vinod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
06.01.2023 in Cr. Rev. No. 15 of 2019 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Madhubani and also the order dated 01.08.2018 passed by the S.D.J.M., Jhajharpur arising out of Complaint Case No. 773 of 2016.
2 . After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to raise all the points at an appropriate stage i.e. at the stage of framing of charge.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29550 of 2023(2) dt.06-08-2024 2/2
3 . Accordingly, this application is dismissed as
withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty to the petitioner.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-
U T
Shivnandan Kamat @ Shibu Kamat
Akhilesh Kamat
Mukesh Kamat
The State of Bihar
Sugiya Devi
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
