Allowed

Ajit Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Oct 2024CR. MISC./29369/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application under the Arms Act after recovery of a country-made pistol; SP reported the seized weapon was not US-made. Granting custody period and report, the court allowed bail with conditions including antecedent verification and monthly police-station attendance.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000 with two like sureties, subject to antecedent verification and attendance at Jasidih PS on first and third Sundays.

Ajit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29369 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-28 Year-2024 Thana- CHANDAN District- Banka

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ajit Kumar Son of Panchanand Yadav Resident of village - Jakha, P.S.Jasidih, District - Deoghar (Jharkhand)

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Brij Nandan Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Mohammed Arif ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

5 25-10-2024

¶11

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶12

learned APP for the State Shri Jharkhandi Upadhyay.

¶13

The counter affidavit on behalf of the

¶14

Superintendent of Police, Banka is filed by Shri Jharkhandi Upadhyay and the same has been perused.

¶15

It has been reported by the Superintendent of Police, Banka that the seized pistol is not made in USA but it is a country made pistol.

¶16

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Chandan (Anandpur) P.S. Case No. 28 of 2024 registered for the offence under Section 25(1-B)a, 26, 27, 35 of the Arms Act.

¶17

The recovery is of one country made pistol from the petitioner.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29369 of 2024(5) dt.25-10-2024 2/3

¶19

The petitioner claims to have clean antecedent and he is in custody since 22.2.2024.

¶20

Considering the report of the Superintendent of Police, Banka and also considering the period of custody, this application is allowed.

¶21

Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka in connection with Chandan (Anandpur) P.S. Case No. 28 of 2024.

¶22

As the petitioner claims to have clean antecedent, the Court below, before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner. If the Court below finds that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, his bail bonds shall be accepted. If the Court below finds that the petitioner is involved in any other case, his bail bonds shall not be accepted.

¶23

As a condition of this order, the petitioner after being released on bail is directed to mark his attendance at Jasidih Police Station on first and third Sunday of each month. Any default in appearance at the police station will result in cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner.

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29369 of 2024(5) dt.25-10-2024 3/3

¶25

Let a copy of this order be communicated to the

¶26

Superintendent of Police, Deoghar through FAX for its

¶27

compliance.

¶28

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶29

Vikas/-

¶30

U T

Ajit Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajit Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gokul Nath Tiwari Vs the State of Bihar

Shamsher Rai and Anr. Vs The State of Bihar

Shiv Shankar Singh @ Bambam Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Baiju Lal Thakur @ Baiju Lal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Dinesh Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Umesh Ram Vs the State of Bihar