In a criminal miscellaneous matter, the Patna High Court was required to decide a bail application for the petitioner arrested under sections 302, 201, 120B, and 34 of the IPC. The court rejected the bail plea due to the gravity of allegations and evidence recovered.
Bail application rejected; petitioner to remain in custody.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29028 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-410 Year-2023 Thana- JAGDISHPUR District- Bhagalpur
======================================================
Pradip Kumar Pankaj S/o Basudev Mandal R/o vill - Athgama (Shankarpur Khawas), P.s. - Kahalgaon (Ghogha), Distt. - Bhagalpur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
| =================== | ================== | ... ... Opposite Party/s ================= |
|---|---|---|
| Appearance : | ||
| For the Petitioner/s : |
Mr.Ashutosh Kumar | |
| For the Opposite Party/s : =================== |
Mr.Rita Verma ================== |
================= |
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
3 05-08-2024
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29028 of 2024(3) dt.05-08-2024 2/2
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)
Nirmal/- U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is eligible for bail given the gravity of the offences and evidence against him.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pradip Kumar Pankaj
The State of Bihar
Nawneet Kumar Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
