Dismissed¶¶18

Jitendar Sao @ Jitendra Sao v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC10 Jul 2024CR. MISC./28903/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court; CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28903 of 2024 (CR. MISC.); Jitendar Sao @ Jitendra Sao v. The State of Bihar; anticipatory bail rejected 10-07-2024 by Anjani Kumar Sharan, J; Sections 7(1)(a)(ii) E.C. Act; Section 35(1)(6) Fertilizer Control Order, 1985; Barachatti/Mohanpur P.S. Case No. 794 of 2023, District Gaya; illegal hoarding of 300 bags Urea and 16 bags DAP; failure to produce sale receipt; farmer petitioner; no criminal antecedent.

What did the court decide?

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the court was not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and accordingly rejected his prayer for anticipatory bail in connection with Barachatti (Mohanpur) P.S. Case No. 794 of 2023. ¶¶18

Jitendar Sao @ Jitendra Sao Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28903 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-794 Year-2023 Thana- BARACHATTI District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Jitendar Sao @ Jitendra Sao Son of Devki Sao Resident of Village- Kewla, Tola- Tintarwa, P.S.- Mohanpur, District- Gaya

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1 ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 10-07-2024

¶11

Heard Arvind Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dilip Kumar no. 1, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶12

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 7(1)(a)(ii) of the E.C. Act and Section 35(1) (6) of the Fertilizer Control Order, 1985.

¶13

As per FIR, allegation against the petitioner is that he caught red handed with illegal hoarding of 300 bags of Urea and 16 bags of DAP fertilizer. It is further alleged that the petitioner failed to produce any type of sale receipt before the informant.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the petitioner and his family members are

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28903 of 2024(2) dt.10-07-2024 2/2

¶16

the farmers and they cultivate their fields for growing paddy crops and wheat etc. and for their cultivation, they had some bags of urea and DAP fertilizers in their house. He submits that the petitioner is not the PDS dealer. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.

¶17

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail submits that the Urea and DAP have been recovered from the house of the petitioner and he did not produce any receipt regarding the seized article.

¶18

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected in connection with Barachatti (Mohanpur) P.S. Case No. 794 of 2023.

¶19

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶20

devendra/-

¶21

Jitendar Sao @ Jitendra Sao v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jitendar Sao @ Jitendra Sao v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Girijesh Nandan Kumar Vs The Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University

Rajiv Ranjan Vs The State of Bihar

The Managing Committee, Madarsa Mofidul Islam Vs The State of Bihar

Chandra Shekhar Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Amit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Jatashankar Jha Vs the State of Bihar