Anticipatory bail application in a Patna district police case; counsel sought permission to withdraw and the court permitted withdrawal, dismissing the application as withdrawn without adjudicating bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2847 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-311 Year-2023 Thana- RUPASPUR District- Patna
======================================================
Krieshna Kumar @ Krishna Yadav @ Umesh Kumar S/o- Chandrama Ray village- Dhanaut, Ps- Rupaspur Dist- Patna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
ORAL ORDER
2 31-01-2024 Learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application.
application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J)
vinita/- U T
Krieshna Kumar @ Krishna Yadav @ Umesh Kumar
The State of Bihar
G. Anupama Chakravarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
