Allowed

Pawan Kumar @ Sonu v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 May 2024CR. MISC./28435/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought pre-arrest bail in a case of alleged abduction of the informant's daughter for marriage; counsel contended the victim was a 23-year-old major who married him by consent. The court granted anticipatory bail on furnishing bonds with conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on Rs.20,000 bond with two like sureties, subject to Section 438(2) CrPC conditions.

Pawan Kumar @ Sonu Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28435 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-427 Year-2023 Thana- BANIAPUR District- Saran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Pawan Kumar @ Sonu S/o Harendra Manjhi Resident of Village- Karah, P.S. Baniapur, Distt.- Saran at Chapra

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vijay Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Satyendra Prasad, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 22-05-2024

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶14

A.P.P for the State.

¶15

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Baniapur P.S. Case No. 427 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363 and 365 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused persons are alleged to have abducted the informant’s daughter for the purpose of marriage.

¶17

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There was love affair between the victim and the petitioner. The victim is a major girl aged 23 years which is mentioned in the F.I.R. itself and also in the statement of the victim recorded u/s

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28435 of 2024(2) dt.22-05-2024 2/2

¶19

164 of the Cr.P.C. The victim went to Delhi and solemnized marriage with the petitioner with her own consent. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no concern with the alleged offence. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition.

¶20

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

¶21

6 . Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the nature of allegation against the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Saran at Chapra in connection with Baniapur P.S. Case No. 427 of 2023, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶22

7 . The application stands allowed.

¶23

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶24

Gautam/-

¶25

U T

Pawan Kumar @ Sonu v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pawan Kumar @ Sonu v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Rakesh Bhushan Singh @ Rakesh Bhushan Vs the State of Bihar

Ghanshyam Mandal @ Ghanshyam Kumar Mandal Vs the State of Bihar

Rakesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Dr. Surjeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Golu Rai @ Abhishek Rai Vs The State of Bihar