Disposed

Vijay Ram v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC20 Apr 2024CR. MISC./27458/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail sought under Sections 399, 402, 414 IPC and Sections 25(1-b)/26/35 Arms Act based on a co-accused's confession naming the petitioner. Considering FIR, custody period and parity with a bailed co-accused, the court allowed bail after framing of charge, or immediately if chargesheet not filed.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be released on bail after framing of charge (or forthwith if no chargesheet) on Rs.10,000 bond with two like sureties before CJM, Gopalganj.

Vijay Ram Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27458 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-197 Year-2023 Thana- MANJHAGARH District- Gopalganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Vijay Ram S/o Manoj Ram RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - UDANT RAI KE BANGRA, P.S. - THAWE, DIST. - GOPALGANJ, BIHAR

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Indrajeet Bhushan, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ahmad Ali, |APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 20-04-2024

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶14

learned APP for the State.

¶15

The petitioner is in custody in connection

¶16

with Manjhagarh P.S Case No. 197 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 399, 402, 414 of the I.P.C & U/S 25(1-b) a / 26 / 35 of Arms Act.

¶17

As per prosecution case, one criminal was arrested while planning a loot and he has named the petitioner in his confessional statement.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is next submitted that co-accused has granted bail by

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27458 of 2024(2) dt.20-04-2024 2/3

¶20

this Court vide order dated 24.01.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 2853 of 2024. It is also submitted that petitioner is in judicial custody since 05.08.2023.

¶21

However, learned APP for the State oppose the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

¶22

On perusal of the FIR, impugned order and period of custody and also considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on bail after framing of the charge on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Manjhagarh P.S Case No. 197 of 2023.

¶23

The trial court is directed to conclude the proceeding of framing of charge according to law within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that if the chargesheet has not been submitted then the petitioner shall

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27458 of 2024(2) dt.20-04-2024 3/3

¶25

be released on bail on the above conditions and he shall be present physically on each and every date before the trial court till conclusion of the proceeding of framing of charge.

¶26

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)

¶27

Mayank/-

¶28

U T

Vijay Ram v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Ram v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Awadhesh Mistry Vs the State of Bihar

Raushan Kumar @ Raushan Kumar Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Himanshu Kumar@ Himanshu Raj Vs The State of Bihar

Subhash Kumar Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Purkha Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Rupesh Kumar @ Rupesh Thakur Vs The State of Bihar