Dismissed¶10

Ramesh Kamti v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC5 Jan 2024CR. MISC./27343/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail rejected; NDPS Act Sections 8 and 20(ii)(b)(c); 330 Kg. ganja recovery; commercial quantity contraband; pickup van driver; subsequent/second bail application after rejection in Cr. Misc. No.10136 of 2022; prolonged custody since 07.07.2021 with no trial witness examined; Kulwant Singh v. State of Punjab (Supreme Court) distinguished on age; co-ordinate Bench order Cr. Misc. No.9036 of 2023 distinguished; direction to conclude trial within nine months; Patna High Court; Cr. Misc. No.27343 of 2023; Khatim Reza, J.; PS Case No.27 of 2021, Nawada.

What did the court decide?

No relief to the petitioner; prayer for bail again rejected. Trial Court directed to conclude the trial positively within nine months from receipt/production of a copy of the order. ¶10

Ramesh Kamti Vs the State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2024)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

No relief to the petitioner; prayer for bail again rejected. Trial Court directed to conclude the trial positively within nine months from receipt/production of a copy of the order.

¶10

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioner — driver of the pickup van from which 330 Kg. of ganja was recovered — should be enlarged on bail in Special (NDPS) Case No.27 of 2021, his earlier bail prayer having already been rejected on 28.09.2022. +1 more

¶2

Court's answer

The precedents pressed by the petitioner do not assist him: the Supreme Court in Kulwant Singh granted bail taking into consideration the advanced age of the accused therein, whereas this petitioner has himself disclosed his age as 41 years; further, the facts and circumstances of the co-ordinate Bench order in Cr. Misc. No.9036 of 2023 were found to be quite different.

¶8

Ratio / Principle

In view of the recovery of a huge quantity of ganja from the pickup van of which the petitioner was the driver, coupled with the fact that no fresh ground for grant of bail had been made out, the Court was not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and his prayer was again rejected.

¶9

Key takeaways

As a consequential direction while declining bail, the trial Court was directed to take all endeavour and conclude the trial positively within a period of nine months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of the order.ratio¶11

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Patna High Court (Khatim Reza, J., 05-01-2024), Cr. Misc. No.27343 of 2023: Repeat bail application under Sections 8 and 20(ii)(b)(c) of the NDPS Act arising from alleged recovery of 330 Kg. ganja concealed in mango baskets in a pickup van (BR 33 M 4043) driven by the petitioner; earlier prayer rejected on 28.09.2022 in Cr. Misc. No.10136 of 2022. Reliance on Kulwant Singh v. State of Punjab (SLA (Crl.) 5187 of 2021, SC) held unavailing as bail there turned on the accused's advanced age, whereas this petitioner disclosed his age as 41 years; the co-ordinate Bench order in Cr. Misc. No.9036 of 2023 was held distinguishable, its facts being 'quite different'. With charges framed on 30.05.2023 and no official witness examined (trial Court report dated 06.11.2023), and no fresh ground made out, bail was again rejected; the trial Court was directed to conclude the trial positively within nine months.

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27343 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-27 Year-2021 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Nawada

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ramesh Kamti, aged about 41 years, Male, S/O Late Ramashish Kamti, resident of village- Kalyanpur, P.S- Chakmehsi, Distt.- Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. N. K. Agrawal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sanjeet Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kumar Veerendra Narayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER

¶10

4 05-01-2024

¶11

Heard Mr. N. K. Agrawal, learned senior counsel for

¶12

the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶13

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Special (NDPS) Case No.27 of 2021 dated 06.07.2021, instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 8 and 20(ii)(b)(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act.

¶14

Prayer of the petitioner for bail was earlier rejected by this Court vide order dated 28.09.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No.10136 of 2022.

¶15

The allegation is of recovery of 330 Kg. Ganja from the pickup van bearing registration nu. BR 33 M 4043 of which the petitioner was the driver.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27343 of 2023(4) dt.05-01-2024 2/4

¶17

Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the driver of the pickup van and on the instruction of the owner of the pickup van he had gone to Orissa with the mangoes loaded on his pickup van and he parked his vehicle in Mango Depot named and styled as Bohra Transport and thereafter went to transport office for taking rest. On 05.07.2021, he was returning from Orissa to Samastipur and when he reached near Samekt Jaanch Chauki, Rajauli, the pickup van was checked and 330 Kg. Ganja was recovered kept in mango basket. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 07.07.2021, but not a single witness has been examined in the case till date as per report of the Court below. Learned senior counsel has relied on the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in in the case of Kulwant Singh Vs. State of Punjab; SLA (Crl.) 5187 of 2021 decided on 10.11.2021, wherein, the Hon’ble Supreme Court was pleased to grant bail to the accused in a case of recovery of contraband of commercial quantity taking into consideration the advance age of the said accused as also the period of custody which was two years. Learned senior counsel has also placed reliance on the order dated 29.04.2023 passed in Cr. Misc No.9036 of 2023 by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court by which petitioner of that

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27343 of 2023(4) dt.05-01-2024 3/4

¶19

case was granted bail in a case in which contraband was recovered. Learned senior counsel submitted that the case of the petitioner is covered from the aforesaid two decisions and prayed that the petitioner be released on bail.

¶20

Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail.

¶21

A report about the present stage of trial and the likely time to be consumed in its conclusion was earlier called for from the trial Court which has been received. From the report of the trial Court, it appears that charges have been framed on 30.05.2023 and there are total five official witnesses but till the date of submission of report not a single witness was examined. The trial Court has opined that the trial is likely to be concluded within 6-8 months if the prosecution produces the witnesses expeditiously. The report of the lower court is dated 06.11.2023.

¶22

Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this Court finds that the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Kulwant Singh (supra) has been pleased to grant bail taking into consideration the advance age of the petitioner. In the present case, the petitioner himself has disclosed his age as 41 years. Further, this Court finds that facts and circumstances mentioned in Cr. Misc. No.9036 of 2023, by which a co-ordinate Bench of

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27343 of 2023(4) dt.05-01-2024 4/4

¶24

this Court has granted bail in another case in which contraband was seized, is quite different.

¶25

In view of recovery of huge quantity of Ganja from the pickup van of which the petitioner was driver coupled with the fact that no fresh ground has been made out for grant of bail, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶26

Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner for bail is again rejected.

¶27

However, the trial Court is directed to take all endeavor and conclude the trial positively within a period of nine months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶28

The application stands disposed of.

¶29

(Khatim Reza, J)

¶30

J. Alam/-

Ramesh Kamti v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramesh Kamti v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Prasad Das Vs Deebakar Das

Ram Kishore Hajjam Vs Bechu Pal

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs Budhan Sah and Anr.

Urmilla Devi Jain Vs Ashok Kumar

The State of Bihar Vs Kashish Developers Limited

Kamleshwari Pd. Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.