Regular bail application under IPC Sections 302, 120(B), 34 and Arms Act Section 27 for firing on informant's father who died of gunshot injuries. Petitioner named in FIR; court declined bail and rejected the prayer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26286 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-161 Year-2022 Thana- PARASBIGHA District- Jehanabad
======================================================
Randhir Kumar @ Jahanu Son Of Late Lal Yadav @ Makarm Resident Of Village- Mishrabigha, Ps- Parsbigha, Dist- Jehanabad
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanju Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA
ORAL ORDER
4 12-07-2024
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26286 of 2024(4) dt.12-07-2024 2/2
submitted that petitioner is in judicial custody since 06.04.2023.
7 Hence, prayer for the regular bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.
(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)
Mayank/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, named in the FIR with specific allegation of firing that caused death, should be granted regular bail.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Randhir Kumar @ Jahanu
The State of Bihar
Ramesh Chand Malviya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
