Allowed

Sanjay Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC23 Apr 2024CR. MISC./24080/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application under Sections 458 and 380 IPC for theft of buffaloes. Petitioner not named in FIR and implicated only via co-accused's confession; investigation complete and chargesheet filed. Bail allowed on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount to satisfaction of A.C.J.M. II, Barh, Patna.

Sanjay Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24080 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-31 Year-2015 Thana- MOKAMAH District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sanjay Yadav, aged about 35 years, Male Son of Bharath Yadav, Resident of Village- Bampur, P.S. - Pandarak, District- Patna.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Premchandra Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Raj Kishor Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA

¶7

ORAL ORDER

¶8

2 23-04-2024

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶10

APP for the State.

¶11

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Mokama P.S. Case No. 31 of 2015 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 458 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

As per the prosecution case, it is a case of missing of buffallos of the informant.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence and has falsely been implicated in this case merely on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Baleshwar Yadav. Petitioner has not named in the FIR and no incriminating article has been recovered from the direct or indirect possession of the

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24080 of 2024(2) dt.23-04-2024 2/2

¶15

petition. No Test Identification Parade is held till date and chargesheet has already been submitted against the petitioner by the police. Petitioner is in custody since 26.09.2023.

¶16

Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail.

¶17

From perusal of the FIR and impugned order of the

¶18

learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-1st, Barh, Patna dated 20.12.2023, it appears that petitioner is not named in the FIR. The name of the petitioner has been surfaced only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused namely, Baleshwar Yadav. Investigation has already been completed and chargesheet has already been submitted to the accused persons, accordingly the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.II, Barh, Patna in connection with Mokama P.S. Case No. 31 of 2015.

¶19

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)

¶20

Anand Kr.

¶21

Sanjay Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mustak Mian Vs The State of Bihar

Roushan Kumar @ David Vs The State of Bihar

Lalu Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Gorakh Rai @ Gorakh Ray @ Nirmal @ Nirmal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Deepak Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Gauri Sahni Vs the State of Bihar