Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in a kidnapping case involving the minor daughter of the informant. Considering the victim's statement under section 164 CrPC supporting the prosecution case and the gravity of the offence, the Patna High Court rejected the prayer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2393 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-186 Year-2023 Thana- NAVINAGAR District- Aurangabad
======================================================
ANKIT KUMAR @ RAUSHAN KUMAR SON OF DILIP SINGH @ DEELIP SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- ANANDUA, POLICE STATION- NABINAGAR, DISTRICT- AURANGABAD (BIHAR).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umakant Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nand Kumar , APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
3 07-03-2024
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the
State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2393 of 2024(3) dt.07-03-2024 2/2
under section 164 Cr. P . C . and gravity of offence , prayer for pre-arrest bail of the petitioner is rejected.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Koushik/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether pre-arrest bail should be granted to the petitioner apprehending arrest for kidnapping a minor with intent to marry her.
4 provisions across 2 enactments
Ankit Kumar @ Raushan Kumar
The State of Bihar
Prabhat Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
