Vishwanath Ray Vs The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Malti Kumari, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Choubey Jawahar, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER

¶11

4 19-07-2024

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

¶13

2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during the pendency of the anticipatory bail application, petitioner no. 2, namely, Ranjit Ray has been arrested.

¶14

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner no. 2 wants to withdraw this application so far as it relates to petitioner no. 2.

¶15

4. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this anticipatory bail application so far as it relates to petitioner no. 2, namely, Ranjit Ray is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23661 of 2024(4) dt.19-07-2024 2/3

¶17

5. The petitioner no. 1 apprehends arrest in connection with G.R. No. 6504 of 2023 arising out of Muffasil P.S. Case No. 483 of 2023 dated 13.11.2023, instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 325, 307, 379, 427 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶18

6. The allegation against petitioner no. 1, is that he along with others fired upon the informant and his family members with country made pistol, which hit son of the informant, thereafter, he was taken to hospital for treatment.

¶19

7. Learned counsel for the petitioner no. 1 submits that the petitioner no. 1 is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. It is submitted that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner no. 1 rather it is general and omnibus allegation. It is submitted that petitioner no. 1 and the informant are agnates and there is admitted land dispute between the parties. It is further submitted that other co-accused persons, namely, Amit Ray @ Amit Kumar and Prem Sagar @ Prem Sagar Kumar have been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 18.03.2024 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 17790 of 2024. Lastly, it has been submitted that he has no criminal antecedent.

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23661 of 2024(4) dt.19-07-2024 3/3

¶21

8. On the other hand, learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed he prayer for bail and submitted that all the accused persons assaulted the informant's side and informant's side also received injuries.

¶22

9. Learned A.P.P. also opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner no. 1.

¶23

10. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest / surrender of the petitioner no. 1, namely, Vishwanath Ray within a period of six weeks from today, in connection with G.R. No. 6504 of 2023 arising out of Muffasil P.S. Case No. 483 of 2023, he shall be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-VIIth, Bhojpur, Ara, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶24

(Khatim Reza, J)

¶25

prabhat/-

¶26

U T

Vishwanath Ray v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vishwanath Ray v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Punjab National Bank Vs Ramanuj Bharti

Banshidhar Choubey and Ors. Vs Sri Kishun Prasad Singh and Ors.

Bhola Thakur Vs Umashankar Bharti

Latan Yadav @ Amresh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Israil Vs The State of Bihar

Suresh Pal @ Suresh Manjhi Vs The State Of Bihar