Petitioner sought permission to withdraw a quashing application as it had become infructuous during pendency. The High Court granted permission and dismissed the application as withdrawn. No proposition of law decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23478 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-26 Year-2015 Thana- TARARI District- Bhojpur
======================================================
SHIV MUNI RAI @ SHIV MUNI SHARMA @ SHIV MUNI Son of Nandjee Sharma Nandjee bhatt Resident of Village- Balubandh, P.S.Charpokhari, District- Bhojpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Choubey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Upendra Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 15-03-2024
At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this quashing application as the same has become infructuous during the pendency.
withdrawn.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Navya/-
U T
Shiv Muni Rai @ Shiv Muni Sharma @ Shiv Muni
The State of Bihar
Prabhat Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
