Allowed¶19

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Sah v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Mar 2024CR. MISC./22859/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, Criminal Miscellaneous No.22859 of 2024, decided 20-03-2024 by Partha Sarthy, J. Bail renewal granted after framing of charge; offences under Sections 302 and 34 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act; Sadar P.S. Case no.481 of 2023, Muzaffarpur; custody since 24.5.2023; earlier rejection dated 20.12.2023 in Cr. Misc. No.68971 of 2023; charge framed 9.1.2024 in Sessions Trial no.945 of 2023; bail bond Rs.10,000/- with two like sureties to CJM Muzaffarpur; petitioner Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Sah; State of Bihar represented by APP Abhay Kumar Roy.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail in connection with Sadar P.S. Case no.481 of 2023 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur ¶19

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Sah Vs the State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22859 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-481 Year-2023 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR SADAR DistrictMuzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MUKESH KUMAR @ MUKESH SAH S/O JAILAL SAH @ JAI MANGAL SAH R/O VILLAGE- BISHUNPUR GIDHA, P.S- MANIYARI, DISTT.MUZAFFARPUR.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mani Bhushan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar Roy, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 20-03-2024

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶12

The petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail in

¶13

connection with Sadar P.S. Case no.481 of 2023 registered under sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶14

As per the prosecution case, as a result of indiscriminate firing resorted to by the accused persons, it is stated that the husband of the informant who made an attempt to escape was shot and fell down injured. The accused escaped.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not the assailant of the deceased. He is in custody since 24.5.2023. The earlier application for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 20.12.2023 passed in Cr. Misc.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22859 of 2024(2) dt.20-03-2024 2/2

¶17

no.68971 of 2023 giving liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. Learned counsel referring to the statement made in paragraph no.6 of the petition together with the photocopy of the certified copy of the order dated 9.1.2024 passed in Sessions Trial no.945 of 2023, it is submitted that charge has been framed against the petitioner in the learned trial Court on 9.1.2024. As such, he be enlarged on bail. He undertakes to cooperate in the trial.

¶18

Heard learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶19

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the petitioner having remained in custody since 24.5.2023, the observation given in the earlier order of rejection dated 20.12.2023 and charge having been framed against the petitioner on 9.1.2024 as is evident from the order dated 9.1.2024 (Annexure-3) passed in Sessions Trial no.945 of 2023, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in connection with Sadar P.S. Case no.481 of 2023 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.

¶20

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶21

Saurabh/- U T

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Sah v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Sah v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Suraj Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Kumar @ Shallu Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Rajendra Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Sakaldev Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Pravesh Singh Vs The State of Bihar