The Court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the quashing application, allowing an amicable settlement, and subsequently dismissed the present quashing application as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the quashing application was accorded, and the application was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22702 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2017 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Rohtas
======================================================
Mohd. Zameer Noor @ Mohd. Zameer @ Tinku Son of Mohd. Sadique Zafar, resident of Mohalla- Neel Kothi, P.S.- Dihri, District- Rohtas Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Mukund For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER
A.P.P. for the State.
there are chances of amicable settlement, as such, seeks permission to withdraw the quashing application.
dismissed as withdrawn.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
amit/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to permit withdrawal of the quashing application.
Mohd. Zameer Noor
The State Of Bihar
SATYAVRAT VERMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
