Allowed

Bullet Sah v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC10 Sept 2024CR. MISC./22419/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a POCSO case alleging child abduction. The court noted the victim's statement doubting the prosecution case and ordered release on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties to the satisfaction of the Special Judge, POCSO, Bettiah, West Champaran.

Bullet Sah Vs The State of Bihar — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22419 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-200 Year-2023 Thana- GAUNAHA District- West Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Bullet Sah Son Of Late Brahmdeo Sah Resident Of Village- Khajuriya, PsKhajuriya, Distt- East Champaran.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Sobha Devi Wife Of Sarvesh Shrivastava Resident Of Village- Gauhana, Mani Tola, Ps- Gaunaha, Dist- West Champaran

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sarvesh Kashyap For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nagendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

8 10-09-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

This is an application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner for the offences alleged under Sections 363, 366/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8 of the POCSO Act, registered in connection with Gaunaha P.S. Case No. 200 of 2023.

¶15

The allegation against the petitioner along with others is of abducting the daughter of the informant.

¶16

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he has been falsely implicated in this case and has committed no offence. The victim girl has been recovered and

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22419 of 2024(8) dt.10-09-2024 2/2

¶18

her statement has been recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. in which she stated that she herself went out from house as she was angry with her mother, which does not corroborate the prosecution case. Moreover, petitioner is a person of clean antecedent and he is in custody since 19.10.2023.

¶19

Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer

¶20

of bail.

¶21

Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above-named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Session Judge-7th-cum-Special Judge, POCSO, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Gaunaha P.S. Case No. 200 of 2023, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the Court.

¶22

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

¶23

Arish/-

¶24

U T

Bullet Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bullet Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nashim khan @ Nasim Khan Vs The State of Bihar

Lalu Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Kaushalya Devi @ Koshila Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Rahul Sharma @ Bankatesh Sharma @ Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Pintu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Arjun Kumar Mandal Vs The State of Bihar