Allowed

Vikash Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Mar 2024CR. MISC./22306/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after recovery of 150 litres of liquor from two motorcycles. Petitioner claimed false implication and no conscious possession. Considering custody period and circumstances, the court granted bail with conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount, one surety a family member, subject to trial attendance conditions.

Vikash Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22306 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-62 Year-2024 Thana- MALSALAMI District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Vikash Kumar S/O- Late Police Ray R/O- Village- Sukumarpur Jafrabad Tok, P.S.- Raghopur, Dist.- Vaishali, At Present Residing Of Village- Damrahi Ghat Near Panitanki, P.S.- Malsalami, Dist.- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Jay Ram Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Khurshid Anwar, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 22-03-2024

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶14

APP for the State.

¶15

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Malsalami P.S. Case No. 62 of 2024 instituted for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶16

The prosecution case, in short, is that total 150 litres of liquor was recovered from two motorcycles.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner is not the owner of the motorcycle in question. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22306 of 2024(2) dt.22-03-2024 2/2

¶19

liquor. The petitioner is in custody since 14.02.2024 and has three criminal antecedents but he is on bail in all the cases. There is no compliance of Section 100 of the Cr.P.C.

¶20

Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶21

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶22

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Malsalami P.S. Case No. 62 of 2024, subject to the following conditions:

¶23

(I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

¶24

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

¶25

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶26

Alok Verma/-

¶27

U T

Vikash Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikash Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lal Babu Ram Vs the State of Bihar

Madan Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Kumar @ Sonu Raut Vs the State of Bihar

Raju Yadav @ Raja @ Raja Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Sujeev Kumar Das @ Sujeet Kumar @ Sujeet Das Vs The State of Bihar

Dindeyal Sah @ Dindeyal Kumar Vs the State of Bihar