Allowed

Gorakh Nut v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Apr 2024CR. MISC./22255/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner, Gorakh Nut, in an Arms Act case after the chargesheet was submitted and noting his five-month custody and lack of possession of incriminating articles.

What did the court decide?

Enlargement of the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-V, Danapur.

Gorakh Nut Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22255 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-447 Year-2023 Thana- KHAGAUL District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Gorakh Nut S/o Maina Nut R/o Vill - Badi Badalpura near Rama Nursery, P.S. - Khagaul, Dist. - Patna

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Sharda Kumari, APP

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 04-04-2024

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶15

The petitioner has preferred this application for

¶16

grant of regular bail in connection with Khagaul P.S. Case no. 447 of 2023 registered under sections 25(1-B)(a) and 26 of the

¶17

Arms Act.

¶18

As per the prosecution case, a country made

¶19

pistol and two live cartridges were recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

¶20

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. No incriminating article has been recovered from his possession. He is in custody since 27.10.2023 and has no criminal antecedent. Chargesheet has been submitted in the case.

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22255 of 2024(2) dt.04-04-2024 2/2

¶22

Heard learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶23

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

¶24

taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioner in the F.I.R., no incriminating article having been recovered from his possession, his being in custody for 5 months since 27.10.2023 and chargesheet having been submitted in the case, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in connection with Khagaul P.S. Case no. 447 of 2023 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-V, Danapur.

¶25

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶26

Bibhash

¶27

Gorakh Nut v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gorakh Nut v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aslam @ Md. Aslam Vs The State of Bihar

Pappu Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Rajnish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Dharmendra Kumar @ Doma Vs The State of Bihar

Rameshwar Sahani Vs The State of Bihar

Roshan Kumar @ Roshan Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar