Dismissed¶21

Ramesh Yadav @ Ramesh Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC18 Sept 2024CR. MISC./22249/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court; Criminal Miscellaneous No.22249 of 2024; decided 18-09-2024 by Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan; anticipatory bail rejected; petitioner Ramesh Yadav @ Ramesh Kumar s/o Jivlal Yadav, Village Nawadih, Barachatti, Gaya; Barachatti P.S. Case No. 627 of 2017; IPC Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 324, 307/34; alleged assault with Falsa on informant's husband; counsel Vijay Kumar argued omnibus/general allegation, unspecified fracture in injury report, no criminal antecedent; APP Jagdhar Prasad opposed; prayer for anticipatory bail rejected.

What did the court decide?

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of the offence, the Court was not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail and rejected the prayer for anticipatory bail. ¶21

Ramesh Yadav @ Ramesh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22249 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-627 Year-2017 Thana- BARACHATTI District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ramesh Yadav @ Ramesh Kumar S/O Jivlal Yadav R/O Village- Nawadih, P.S- Barachatti, Distt.- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jagdhar Prasad ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 18-09-2024

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

A.P.P. for the State.

¶14

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Barachatti P.S. Case No. 627 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 324, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is said to have assaulted on the head of the informant’s husband by means of Falsa .

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He submits that the injury report does not specify the nature of the injury, but it

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22249 of 2024(3) dt.18-09-2024 2/2

¶18

is mentioned as fracture. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

¶19

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

¶20

anticipatory bail.

¶21

Considering the facts and circumstances of case and the nature of the offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

¶22

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶23

anand/- U T

Ramesh Yadav @ Ramesh Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramesh Yadav @ Ramesh Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramesh Kumar Trivedi Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Raj Kumar Mazumdar Vs The State of Bihar

Abhay Kumar @ Abhay Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Birendra Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Abhay Kumar Singh @ Abhay Singh Vs the State of Bihar