Allowed

Ranjan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC1 Apr 2024CR. MISC./22170/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Justice Rudra Prakash Mishra granted bail to the petitioner in connection with an FIR under Sections 401 and 414 IPC, considering the submission of the charge sheet, the petitioner's clean antecedents, and the parity accorded to co-accused.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Court below.

Ranjan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22170 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-259 Year-2023 Thana- GAYA RAIL P.S. District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ranjan Kumar son of Pramod Singh @ Pramod Ram Village- Manpur sindho Nagar Ps- Muffasil Dist- Gaya

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinod Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶9

ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 01-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶11

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Gaya Rail P.S. Case No. 259 of 2023 instituted for the offence under Sections 401 & 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

3. Prosecution story, in short, is that at Railway station, three persons, including this petitioner, started fleeing away on seeing the police, but they were apprehended by the police and total six mobile phones were recovered from them.

¶13

4. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 03-09-2023. Petitioner is stated to be man of clean antecedent.

¶14

5. It has been further submitted by the petitioner’s

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22170 of 2024(2) dt.01-04-2024 2/2

¶16

counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. There is no specific overt act is alleged against this petitioner. It is lastly submitted Charge sheet has already been submitted in this case. Other co-accused has granted bail by this Court, vide order dated 05-12-2023, passed in Cr. Misc. No.78255 of 2024.

¶17

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶18

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner, charge sheet being submitted and claim based on parity, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶19

8. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Gaya Rail P.S. Case No. 259 of 2023.

¶20

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

Ranjan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kishan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Singh @ Santosh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Chandrasen Kumar @ Chintu Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Chand Khan @ Sakir Anshari Vs The State of Bihar

Sanuj Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Ranjay Bind @ Ranjit Singh Vs the State of Bihar