In a bail application under IPC Sections 341, 323, 304(B), and 34, this court rejected the prayer for bail due to lack of defence cooperation and non-cooperative trial proceedings. The court directed the trial court to conclude the trial within four months.
Bail application dismissed. Trial directed to be concluded within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22165 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-393 Year-2019 Thana- AMARPUR District- Banka
======================================================
PRADIP RANA @ PRADEEP RANA S/O- RABINDRA RANA R/OVILLAGE- BELA, P.S.- AMARPUR, DIST.- BANKA.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR, PATNA
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Patanjali Rishi, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Suman Kumari Singh, APP. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER
4 12-07-2024
Heard learned counsels for the parties.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22165 of 2024(4) dt.12-07-2024 2/2
as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four
months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)
divyanshi/-
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner given the trial stage and report submitted regarding defence non-cooperation.
What direction should be given to the trial court regarding the conclusion of the trial.
Pradip Rana
State of Bihar
Anjani Kumar Sharan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
