Oral order rejecting anticipatory bail and directing the petitioner to surrender for regular bail based on Supreme Court directions.
Anticipatory bail rejected; petitioner directed to surrender for regular bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21761 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-467 Year-2020 Thana- RIVILGANJ District- Saran
======================================================
AKHILESH YADAV @ AKHILESH RAY Son of Raj Kumar Ray Resident of village - Pachpatra, P.S.- Revilganj, Dist.- Saran at present residing at Prabhat School Phase, Rinku Bhai Chai, Room No.- 08, Silvassa, Dadar and Nagar Haveli - 396230.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Binod Kumar Sinha For the State : Mr.Pawan Kumar Chaurasia For O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Ajay Kumar Gautam
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
12 12-01-2024
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the Electricity Department and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21761 of 2023(12) dt.12-01-2024 2/2
rejected by this Court vide order dated 19.05.2022 in Cr. Misc. No. 32611 of 2021.
court below and make a prayer for regular bail. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)
SONALI/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is directed to surrender and seek regular bail as per Supreme Court orders.
Akhilesh Yadav @ Akhilesh Ray
The State of Bihar
The North Bihar Power Distribution Co. Ltd.
Nawneet Kumar Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
