In a bail application under IPC Section 392, the petitioner sought release citing innocence and lack of T.I.P., noting his clean record as not being a factor. The court declined bail.
Prayer for regular bail refused. Liberty granted to renew bail application six months after framing of charges.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21050 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-143 Year-2021 Thana- GORAUL District- Vaishali
======================================================
Sarfaraj @ Prince @ Raja S/O- Md Ayub R/O- Village- Hathsarganj, P.S.Hajipur Town, Dist.- Vaishali.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satya Prakash Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Khare, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER
2 04-04-2024
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21050 of 2024(2) dt.04-04-2024 2/2
criminal antecedents of the petitioner police have remanded him in this case. There is 11 criminal cases pending against the petitioner and he is on bail in all cases.
(Dr. Anshuman, J)
Mkr./-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail in the robbery FIR given his criminal antecedents and recovery of material subject to his possession.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sarfaraj @ Prince @ Raja S/O- Md Ayub
The State Of Bihar
Dr. Anshuman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
