Allowed¶21

Aatindra Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC19 Mar 2024CR. MISC./20988/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, Criminal Miscellaneous No.20988 of 2024, decided 19-03-2024 by Rudra Prakash Mishra, J.: bail allowed to Aatindra Yadav in Hathua P.S. Case No. 22 of 2024 under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act; alleged recovery of 63.00 liters liquor from gunny bag on motorcycle; custody since 14.02.2024; bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two like sureties to the satisfaction of the Court below/concerned, Gopalganj.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Gopalganj, in connection with Hathua P.S. Case No. 22 of 2024. ¶21

Aatindra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20988 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2024 Thana- HATHUA District- Gopalganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Aatindra Yadav Son of Jayprakash Yadav Resident of Village- Hata Kodara, Ps- Mirganj, Dist- Gopalganj

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Deepankar Raj, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwary, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 19-03-2024

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Hathua P.S. Case No. 22 of 2024 dated 13.02.2024 instituted for the offences under Section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶15

The prosecution case, in short, is that 63.00 liters liquor was recovered from the gunny bag which was kept on the motorcycle.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this Case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20988 of 2024(2) dt.19-03-2024 2/2

¶18

possession of the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has transpired in this case only on the basis of the confessional statement of the apprehended person. The petitioner is not the owner of the said vehicle and the same was not being driven by the petitioner at the time of alleged recovery. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. The petitioner is in custody since 14.02.2024 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 100 of Cr.P.C.

¶19

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶21

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Gopalganj, in connection with Hathua P.S. Case No. 22 of 2024.

¶22

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶23

Jyoti/ Raj Kishore/-

¶24

Aatindra Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aatindra Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tasir Alam Vs the State of Bihar

Ajay Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Baidya Nath Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjeet Sahni Vs The State of Bihar

Guddu Kumar @ Guddu Kushwaha Vs The State of Bihar

Sujan Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar