Allowed¶23

Paras Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Jul 2024CR. MISC./19523/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Paras Kumar; Bathnaha P.S. Case No. 501/2023; Sitamarhi; Section 414 IPC; Sections 25(1-B)a, 26 and 35 Arms Act; regular bail granted; bail-bond Rs.20,000/-; two sureties of like amount; custody since 12.11.2023; recovery of country-made katta and mobile phone; Patna High Court; CR. MISC. No.19523 of 2024; Chandra Prakash Singh, J; decided 25-07-2024; application allowed.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted; petitioner to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Sitamarhi, in connection with Bathnaha P.S. Case No. 501/2023. ¶23

Paras Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19523 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-501 Year-2023 Thana- BATHNAHA District- Sitamarhi

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Paras Kumar S/o Ramesh Das R/o vill - Matiyar Khurd, P.S. - Sahiyara, Distt. - Sitamarhi

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Hans Lal Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Syed Ehteshamuddin, APP

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶13

ORAL ORDER

¶14

5 25-07-2024

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

¶16

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Bathnaha P.S. Case No. 501/2023 dated 11.11.2023 registered for the offence punishable u/s 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

¶17

3. As per the prosecution case, a country-made katta and a mobile phone were recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

¶18

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19523 of 2024(5) dt.25-07-2024 2/2

¶20

possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 12.11.2023.

¶21

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

¶22

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Sitamarhi in connection with Bathnaha P.S. Case No. 501/2023.

¶23

7. The application stands allowed.

¶24

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶25

atul/-

¶26

U T

Paras Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Paras Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishna Rai Vs the State of Bihar

Sanjay Manjhi Sadhu Vs The State of Bihar

Kanchan Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Dhirendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Imran @ Raja @ Md. Raja Vs The State of Bihar

Subhash Yadav @ Subhash Kumar @ Shubahsh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar