Allowed

Santosh Singh @ Santosh Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC2 Apr 2024CR. MISC./19498/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh allowed a bail petition filed by social activists facing charges of land grabbing. The court diagnosed the FIR as falsely lodged in a civil dispute context with inordinate delay.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for anticipatory bail allowed; petitioners enlarged on bail on surrender within six weeks furnishing bond and bail bonds.

Santosh Singh @ Santosh Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Corruption | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19498 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-301 Year-2023 Thana- WAJIRGANJ District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Santosh Singh @ Santosh Kumar Singh Son of Shiv Vachan Singh Resident of Village- Karjani, P.S.- Atri, District- Gaya

¶5

Jitendra Singh @ Pappu Singh @ Jeetendra Prasad Singh Son of not given in petition Resident of Mohalla- Ashok Nagar, P.S.- Rampur, District- Gaya

¶6

... ... Petitioners

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Versus ... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Subham Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 02-04-2024

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the

¶15

State.

¶16

Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 467, 468, 420, 447, 504/120B of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

As per the prosecution case, all the FIR named accused persons including these petitioners and other accused persons were engaged in forcibly selling the land to other persons of which informant had the power of attorney.

¶18

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are social activists and informant is in fact a land mafia and with a view to pressurize the petitioners, he lodged this case falsely implicating these petitioners. The dispute is

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19498 of 2024(2) dt.02-04-2024 2/2

¶20

purely of civil nature. F.I.R. has been lodged after inordinate delay of 16 days without any explanation which renders the entire prosecution case doubtful. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

¶21

Considering the aforesaid facts of the case, prayer for bail of all the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within six weeks from today, let these petitioners, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate I, Gaya in Wazirganj Police Station Case No. 301 of 2023, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶22

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶23

Shashi

¶24

U T

Santosh Singh @ Santosh Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santosh Singh @ Santosh Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ranjeet Kumar Singh @ Ranjeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Chanda Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Soyeb Akhtar Vs The State of Bihar

Gautam Kumar @ Minku Pandey Vs The State of Bihar

Rani Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Singh @ Rahul Raj Vs the State of Bihar