Allowed¶21

Sidhharth Rishabdev Satyam @ Sunny v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC23 Jan 2024CR. MISC./19199/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Quashing of cognizance order dated 10.05.2019 (Special Judge, POSCO-cum-Additional Sessions Judge-I, Lakhisarai) in Medni Chowki P.S. Case No. 66 of 2018; provisions involved: IPC Sections 376, 420, 313, 504, 506; Section 4 POSCO Act; Section 66(e) Information Technology Act; decision rests on facts recorded in Cr. Misc. No. 19199 of 2021 (Sidhharth Rishabdev Satyam @ Sunny Vs. The State of Bihar); bench: Satyavrat Verma, J; parties: Kavita Kumari @ Kavita Devi, Satyanarayan Prasad Singh, State of Bihar, Suhani Priya.

What did the court decide?

The present quashing application stands allowed; the cognizance order dated 10.05.2019 passed in Medni Chowki P.S. Case No. 66 of 2018 is quashed. ¶21

Sidhharth Rishabdev Satyam @ Sunny Vs the State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55074 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-66 Year-2018 Thana- MEDNI CHAUKI District- Lakhisarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

KAVITA KUMARI @ KAVITA DEVI W/o Satnarayan Prasad Singh @ Satynarayan Singh @ Satyanarayan Resident of Village- Paharpur, P.S.Medni Choki, Distt. Lakhisarai, Bihar, Pin Code- 811106

¶5

Satyanarayan Prasad Singh @ Satynarayan Singh @ Satyanarayan Son of Late Aniruddh Prasad Singh Resident of Village- Paharpur, P.S.- Medni Choki, District- Lakhisarai, Bihar, Pin Code- 811106

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar

¶9

Suhani Priya D/O Suresh Mahto R/O - Paharpur, P.S. - Medini Chowki, District - Lakhisarai

¶10

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Shri Rajendra Narain, Sr. Advocate Shri Alok Ranjan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anil Kumar, A.P.P. For the O.P. No. 2 : Shri Md. Irshad, Advocate ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL JUDGMENT

¶13

Date : 23-01-2024

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.P.P.

¶15

for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2.

¶16

In view of the facts recorded in Cr. Misc. No. 19199

¶17

of 2021 (Sidhharth Rishabdev Satyam @ Sunny Vs. The State of Bihar), the order dated 10.05.2019 passed by the learned Special Judge, POSCO-cum-Additional Sessions Judge-I, Lakhisarai in Medni Chowki P.S. Case No. 66 of 2018 whereby cognizance has been taken under Sections 376, 420, 313, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 4 of the POSCO Act and

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55074 of 2019 dt.23-01-2024 2/2

¶19

Section 66(e) of the Information Technology Act is hereby

¶20

quashed.

¶21