Allowed¶21

Ganesh Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC15 Mar 2024CR. MISC./19060/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail granted; CRL. MISC. No.19060 of 2024; Patna High Court; Rudra Prakash Mishra, J.; decided 15-03-2024; Khudaganj P.S. Case No. 107 of 2023; District Nalanda; Section 392 IPC; robbery/looting of motorcycle and mobile phone by bike-borne miscreants; petitioner not named in FIR; implication via disclosure of co-accused Bindu Yadav; no recovery of looted article; charge-sheet filed; custody since 11.12.2023; four criminal antecedents; bail bonds Rs.10,000 with two sureties; State opposed bail.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted: petitioner to be released on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court below/concerned Court in connection with Khudaganj P.S. Case No. 107 of 2023. ¶21

Ganesh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19060 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-107 Year-2023 Thana- KHUDAGANJ District- Nalanda

¶3

======================================================

¶4

GANESH KUMAR S/O- UDAY YADAV @ RAM UDAY KUMAR R/OVILLAGE- DINA BIGHA, P.S.- ISLAMPUR, DIST.- NALANDA.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 15-03-2024

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Khudaganj P.S. case No. 107 of 2023 instituted for the offences under Sections 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

Prosecution case, in short, is that four unknown bike borne miscreants intercepted the informant and looted his motorcycle and mobile phone and fled away.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner transpired in this case during investigation on the basis of disclosure made by the co-accused Bindu Yadav. No

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19060 of 2024(2) dt.15-03-2024 2/2

¶18

incriminating/looted article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner has got no concern the looted articles. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 11.12.2023 and has four criminal antecedents.

¶19

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶21

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Khudaganj P.S. case No. 107 of 2023.

¶22

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶23

Alok Verma/-

¶24

U T

Ganesh Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ganesh Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rahul Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Raj Kishore Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Mukesh Yadav @ Sunil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Gadar Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Pradip Chaudhary Vs the State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar