Allowed

Sanjay Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC15 Mar 2024CR. MISC./19056/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application under IPC Sections 147-149, 307, 504 and Arms Act Section 27 arising from alleged firing over a land dispute with no injury. Court noted custody period and the subsisting land dispute between agnates and granted bail.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount in connection with Ben P.S. Case No. 178 of 2023.

Sanjay Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19056 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-178 Year-2023 Thana- BEN P.S. District- Nalanda

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sanjay Yadav Son of Late Shivnandan Yadav Resident of Village- Karyara, P.S.- Ben, District- Nalanda

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Sujata Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 15-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶12

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Ben P.S. Case No. 178 of 2023 instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307 & 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶13

3. Prosecution case in a nutshell is that petitioner along with 10 accused persons were ploughing in the field of informant and on protest by the informant, they started firing upon the informant, but he could not sustained injury.

¶14

4. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 28-12-2023. Petitioner bears three criminal antecedents, as per disclosure made in

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19056 of 2024(2) dt.15-03-2024 2/2

¶16

paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

¶17

5. It has been further submitted by the petitioner’s counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is submitted that nobody has sustained any injury in the occurrence. There is subsisting land dispute between the parties. Petitioner and informant are agnates.

¶18

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶19

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner, subsisting land dispute between parties and no injury, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶20

8. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Ben P.S. Case No. 178 of 2023.

¶21

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

Sanjay Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rahul Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Raj Kishore Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Mukesh Yadav @ Sunil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Gadar Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Pradip Chaudhary Vs the State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar