Sanni Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Nathnagar (Madhusudanpur) P.S. Case No. 590 of 2023 instituted for the offences punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶18

As per the prosecution case, accused persons assaulted the informant with country made pistol on the head and snatched Rs. 70,000/-, a Tab of Samsung Company, a mobile phone and Pulsar Motorcycle bearing Registration No. BR 10AH 6013 and fled away.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence and has

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18447 of 2024(4) dt.17-05-2024 2/3

¶21

falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and nothing incriminating articles have been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He next submits that the petitioner has been made accused only on the basis of suspicion. Chargesheet has already been submitted in this case and charge has already been framed. Petitioner is in custody since 25.08.2023.

¶22

Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail.

¶23

From perusal of the FIR, case diary and the impugned order of the learned Sessions Judge, Bhagalpur dated 13.02.2024, it appears that petitioner is not named in the FIR. From perusal of the records, it also appears that the name of the petitioner has been surfaced only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused and the petitioner has not put on Test Identification Parade, accordingly the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner above named be released on bail after framing of charge on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Bhagalpur in connection with Nathnagar (Madhusudanpur) P.S. Case No. 590 of 2023.

¶24

The trial Court is directed to conclude the

¶25

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18447 of 2024(4) dt.17-05-2024 3/3

¶26

proceeding of framing of charge according to law within a period of 15 (fifteen days) from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that if the charge-sheet has not been submitted then the petitioner shall be released on bail on above conditions and further the petitioner shall be present before the trial Court till conclusion of proceeding of charge.

¶27

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)

¶28

Anand Kr.

¶29

U T

Sanni Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanni Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Muntun Sahani Vs The State of Bihar

Mohan Mistri Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Nath Patel @ Dev Nath Prasad @ Dev Nath Prasad Kurmi Vs The State of Bihar

Md Arshad @ Md Arshad Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Manoj Kumar Singh @ Manoj Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Salendra Raut @ Shailendra Raut Vs The State of Bihar