Allowed

Rohit Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC13 Mar 2024CR. MISC./18323/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna, in a criminal miscellaneous matter, allowed the petitioner's prayer for regular bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 9 of 2024. The charge was framed after a year of custody, prompting the court to enlarge the petitioner on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be enlarged on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court of Sessions Judge, Lakhisarai.

Rohit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18323 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-83 Year-2023 Thana- KAJRA District- Lakhisarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rohit Kumar S/o Bhim Yadav R/o vill - Punadih, P.S. - Kajra, Distt. - Lakhisarai

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Sangeeta Sharma, APP

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 13-03-2024

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶15

The petitioner has renewed his prayer for grant of

¶16

regular bail in connection with Sessions Trial no. 9 of 2024, arising out of Kajra P.S Case no. 83 of 2023 registered under sections 307, 379, 323, 354B, 341, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

As per the prosecution case, it is stated that over a dispute amongst the extended family members the petitioner gave a blow with a rod on the head of the informant leading to grievous injuries.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the the earlier application for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 19.10.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. no.66994 of 2023 giving liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18323 of 2024(2) dt.13-03-2024 2/2

¶20

completing one year in custody or after framing of charge, whichever is earlier. It is submitted that charge has been framed against the petitioner on 25.1.2024 in Sessions Trial no. 9 of 2024. The petitioner is in custody since 21.6.2023 and undertakes to cooperate in the trial.

¶21

The prayer for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P for

¶22

the State.

¶23

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the observation given to the petitioner in the earlier order of rejection dated 19.10.2023 and charge having been framed against the petitioner on 25.1.2024 as stated in paragraph no. 8 of the petition, the petitioner who is in custody since 21.6.2023 is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Sessions Trial no. 9 of 2024 (arising out of Kajra P.S Case no.83 of 2023) on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court of Sessions Judge, Lakhisarai.

¶24

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶25

Shiv/-

Rohit Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rohit Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manoj Malakar Vs The State of Bihar

Pankaj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ravi Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Narendra Mahto @ Narendra Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Raja @ Rajwa @ Sunil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Mina Devi Vs The State of Bihar