Allowed

Nandlal Ram @ Nandlal Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC10 Apr 2024CR. MISC./18117/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order allowing anticipatory bail petition. Petitioner sought bail against arrest in an excise case alleging false implication. Court granted bail subject to bond and conditions of Cr.P.C. Section 438(2).

What did the court decide?

Directed petitioner to be released on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 500 with two sureties of like amount to the Excise Judge.

Nandlal Ram @ Nandlal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18117 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-627 Year-2023 Thana- BARUN District- Aurangabad

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Nandlal Ram @ Nandlal Kumar SON OF RAM CHANDRA RAM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BADKA GAON, PS- RISIYAP, DISTTAURAGABAD

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms.Mukul Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Suresh Prasad Singh, APP

¶10

======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 10-04-2024

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as

¶14

learned APP for the State.

¶15

The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018.

¶16

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and has been falsely implicated in the instant case and allegation is of recovery of 87.015 liters of liquor from the house of Sikandar Ram.

¶17

It is further submitted that alleged recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioner and petitioner is in custody since 27.12.2023.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18117 of 2024(3) dt.10-04-2024 2/2

¶19

The learned APP for the State opposes the anticipatory bail application.

¶20

Considering the submission and period of custody of the petitioner, the petitioner above-named is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge of Excise-01, Aurangabad in connection with Barun P.S. Case No.627 of 2023, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶21

The application stands allowed.

¶22

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶23

Prakash Narayan U T

Nandlal Ram @ Nandlal Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nandlal Ram @ Nandlal Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishna Kant Tiwari Vs the State of Bihar

Ram Balak Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Singh @ Vikash Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Abhishek Singh @ Golu @ Abhishek Kumar Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Deepak Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Harendra Rai Vs The State of Bihar