Dismissed¶19

Manish Singh @Manish Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Apr 2024CR. MISC./17838/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, Criminal Miscellaneous No. 17838 of 2024, decided 04-04-2024, Satyavrat Verma, J. Anticipatory bail application of Manish Singh @ Manish Kumar Singh rejected in case arising from PS Case No. 294 of 2023, P.S. Sahebpur Kamal, District Begusarai, offences under Sections 341, 323, 379, 307, 504, 506 and 34 IPC. State opposed citing grievous injuries on vital part of body per the order impugned; petitioner alleged false implication over a pet dog and pleaded self-defence and one prior antecedent. Keywords: anticipatory bail, rejection, IPC 307, grievous injury, Begusarai.

What did the court decide?

Considering the submissions made by the learned A.P.P. for the State, the Court was not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. ¶18

Manish Singh @Manish Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17838 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-294 Year-2023 Thana- SAHEBPUR KAMAL DistrictBegusarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Manish Singh @Manish Kumar Singh SON OF Maheshwar Singh RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SIRAIYA (SARAIYA ), PS- DANDARI, DISTTBEGUSARAI

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shubhesh Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 04-04-2024

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶12

learned A.P.P. for the State, Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad.

¶13

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 379, 307, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of one case and has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that the informant has a pet dog which at times bites and the same was objected by the petitioner when it is alleged that an altercation took place and the petitioner tried to overrun the dog and even assaulted the father of the informant by an iron rod causing injury on head. The learned counsel for the

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17838 of 2024(2) dt.04-04-2024 2/2

¶16

petitioner submits that since the petitioner had objected the conduct of the informant in leaving the dog open, as such, it was the informant’s side who were the aggressors and the petitioner in his defence assaulted.

¶17

Learned A.P.P. for the State, Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that from perusal of the order impugned, it would manifest that the injuries suffered by the injured is grievous in nature and is on vital part of the body and it is not the case of the petitioner that the dog had bitten him.

¶18

Considering the submissions made by the learned APP for the State, the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶19

Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application stands rejected.

¶20

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶21

Rishabh/-

¶22

U T

Manish Singh @Manish Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manish Singh @Manish Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pintu Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sunny Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Karpuri Tanti @ Kapri Tanti Vs The State of Bihar

Sobha Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Rahmat Vs The State of Bihar

Sudhir Sahni @ Sudhir Kumar @ Sudhir Kumar Sahni Vs The State of Bihar