Allowed

Rohit Yadav @ Rohit Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC27 Mar 2024CR. MISC./17453/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioner in case involving registered case charges for IPC and Arms Act offences, conditioned upon arrest or surrender within six weeks and adherence to investigation cooperation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be released on bail on arrest/surrender within six weeks by furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties.

Rohit Yadav @ Rohit Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17453 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-224 Year-2023 Thana- RAGHUNATHPUR District- Siwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rohit Yadav @ Rohit Kumar Yadav S/o Hareram Yadav R/o VillageBhaganrajpur Tola, Chakdahwa, Jaijor, P.S. Aandar, Dist- Siwan

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Prabhat Kumar Munna For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rajesh Kumar ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 27-03-2024

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 414 of the I.P.C. and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

¶14

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of one case and has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that petitioner was not apprehended from the spot rather Prince Kumar and Ranjit Yadav were apprehended by the informant and the police and from their possession, arms and cartridges were recovered. It is next submitted that they disclosed the name of Raju Yadav, who had brought the stolen

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17453 of 2024(2) dt.27-03-2024 2/3

¶16

motorcycle, on which they were riding and also took the name of this petitioner.

¶17

It is submitted that confessional statement in police custody does not have any evidentiary value. It is also submitted that as far as this petitioner is concerned, except for his name being taken in confession, no allegation has been alleged. It is further submitted that petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation.

¶18

Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.

¶19

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1^st Class, Siwan in connection with Raghunathpur P. S. Case No.224 of 2023, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with a condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his father namely, Hareram Yadav.

¶20

The application stands allowed.

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17453 of 2024(2) dt.27-03-2024 3/3

¶22

However, it is made clear that in the event, if any application is filed by the Investigating Officer before the learned trial Court bringing to its notice that petitioner, despite giving assurance to this Court, is not cooperating in the investigation or is not presenting himself as and when required, in that event, the learned trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after recording reasons and to take all coercive action to ensure that the petitioner is behind bar.

¶23

Let this order be communicated to the concerned Police Station through the learned trial Court.

¶24

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶25

vikash/-

¶26

U T

Rohit Yadav @ Rohit Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rohit Yadav @ Rohit Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Radheshyam Paswan @ Radheshyam Pasvan Vs The State of Bihar

Bijay Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Rajveer Kashyap Vs The State of Bihar

Bihari Rai @ Bihari Kumar Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Sakaldip Pawan @ Sakal Paswan Vs the State of Bihar

Umesh Singh @ Prithivi Chandra Singh Vs The State of Bihar