Dismissed¶22

Ajay Basphor v. The State of Bihar

Bail rejected – Sections 363/366A IPC

Patna HC10 Apr 2024CR. MISC./17182/2024

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court bail rejection dated 10-04-2024 in CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17182 of 2024 arising out of PS Case No. 403/2022, Mirganj, Gopalganj; petitioner Ajay Basphor charged under Sections 363/366A IPC for kidnapping and sexual assault of a minor girl (about 14 years); custody since 21.12.2022; victim's Section 164 Cr.P.C. statement supportive of prosecution; bail prayer rejected and Trial Court directed to expedite trial.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for bail rejected; no enlargement ordered. Only directive issued: the learned Trial Court is to expedite the trial. ¶22

Ajay Basphor Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17182 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-403 Year-2022 Thana- MIRGANJ District- Gopalganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ajay Basphor S/o Lalan Basphor R/o Mirganj Dakshin Mohalla, P.S.Mirganj, District- Gopalganj, Bihar

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sumit Shekhar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, APP

¶10

======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 10-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 363/366A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

The petitioner in association of other co-accused

¶16

is said to have kidnapped the daughter of the informant and committed sexual assault against her.

¶17

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He is quite innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case merely on suspicion. It is further submitted that there is nothing in the record indicating the complicity of the petitioner in the occurrence. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17182 of 2024(3) dt.10-04-2024 2/2

¶19

been languishing in custody since 21.12.2022.

¶20

Learned APP for the State vehemently opposing

¶21

the bail petition submitted that the victim is aged about 14 years and in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. has supported the prosecution case in toto. Hence, the petitioner does not deserve bail.

¶22

In the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of the allegation, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for bail is hereby rejected. However, the learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial.

¶23

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶24

Trivedi/-

Ajay Basphor v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay Basphor v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prashant Rai @ Prashant Ram @ Sonu Vs The State of Bihar

Anil Kumar @ Anil Kumar Sah Vs the State of Bihar

Julfekar Ansari Vs The State of Bihar

Ani @ Ani Kumar @Dhiraj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rinku Tiwari @ Ashwani Kumar Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar

Yashwant Singh @ Yashwant Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar