Disposed¶4

Santosh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC23 Aug 2024CR. MISC./17058/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court; Criminal Miscellaneous No.17058 of 2023; Santosh Kumar son of Deodhari Prasad Yadav v. State of Bihar; oral order dated 23-08-2024 by Purnendu Singh, J.; bail application disposed of on petitioner's request to withdraw; arises out of Kesariya/Kesaria P.S. Case No. 484 of 2020, East Champaran (IPC 399, 402, 414; Arms Act 25(1-b)a, 26, 35; N.D.P.S. Act 20); juvenile age determination under Section 94, Juvenile Justice (Care and protection of children) Act, 2015; Juvenile Justice Board, Motihari report — six months required; liberty to file fresh bail application; advocates: Abhishek Kumar (petitioner), Uday Pratap Singh APP (State).

What did the court decide?

Bail application disposed of in view of petitioner's request to withdraw it; no decision rendered on the merits of bail. ¶4

Santosh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17058 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-484 Year-2020 Thana- KESARIA District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SANTOSH KUMAR Son of Deodhari Prasad Yadav Resident of Village - Siswa Kharar, P.S.- Kalyanpur, District - East Champaran

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr.Uday Pratap Singh, APP. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶10

10 23-08-2024

¶11

Heard Mr. Abhishek Kumar, learned counsel

¶12

appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, learned APP for the State.

¶13

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner informs that a report has been submitted by learned Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Motihari at East Champaran in connection with Kesariya P.S. Case No. 484 of 2020 which has been registered under Sections 399, 402 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act and Sections 20 and 20 of the N.D.P.S. Act, informing that for determining the age of the petitioner under Section 94 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and protection of children) Act, 2015 and conclusion of the trial, six months time is required.

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17058 of 2023(10) dt.23-08-2024 2/2

¶15

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that he has received instruction to withdraw the present bail application with liberty to file fresh bail application after the prescribed period as informed by the Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Motihari at East Champaran.

¶16

Considering the said information and submission made on behalf of the petitioner, the bail application stands disposed of.

¶17

(Purnendu Singh, J)

¶18

mantreshwar/-

¶19

U T

Santosh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santosh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nathuni Sah Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Bimal Chandra Mishra Vs The Central Bank Of India and Ors.

Binkatesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Chandani Jha Vs The State of Bihar

Nisha Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Kakku Kumar @Nishikant Kumar Vs The State of Bihar