Petitioner sought withdrawal of the application with liberty to approach the court below, as the impugned order was already under challenge in another criminal miscellaneous case. The High Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Liberty to file a fresh application before the learned Court below.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16905 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2022 Thana- BIBHUTIPUR District- Samastipur
======================================================
Ratnesh Kumar @ Golu S/o Sri Nityanand Singh R/o Vill - Sihma, Ward No. 18, P.S. - Matihani, Dist. - Begusarai
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Advocate For the Informant : Mr. Akash Shankar Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
ajay/-
U T
Ratnesh Kumar @ Golu
The State of Bihar
Rajesh Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
