Ankit Singh @ Ankit Kumar Rai Vs the State of Bihar

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16582 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-100 Year-2023 Thana- JANTA BAZAR District- Saran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ankit Singh @ Ankit Kumar Rai S/O Shri Rajkishor Ray @ Raj Kishor Rai R/O Village- Fuchti Kala, Dayalpur, P.S- Ekma, Distt.- Saran At Chapra.

¶5

Vipul Singh @ Bipul Singh @ Bipul Rai S/O Shri Rajkishor Ray @ Raj Kishor Rai R/O Village- Fuchti Kala, Dayalpur, P.S- Ekma, Distt.- Saran At Chapra.

¶6

Bulet Singh @ Bulet Kumar Singh S/O Shri Rajkishor Ray @ Raj Kishor Rai R/O Village- Fuchti Kala, Dayalpur, P.S- Ekma, Distt.- Saran At Chapra.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 13-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioners seek bail in connection with Janta Bazar P.S. case No. 100 of 2023 instituted for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

Prosecution story, in short, is that when the informant was returning home after purchasing groceries, all the

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16582 of 2024(2) dt.13-03-2024 2/3

¶17

accused persons intercepted him and started assaulting him. It is further alleged that the petitioner no.1 assaulted with daabh on the head of the informant, petitioner no.2 assaulted with fists and petitioner no.3 is alleged to have tried to drag the informant by putting gamchha around his neck.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case due to high handedness of police. No specific overt act is alleged against these petitioners. Learned counsel further submitted that no injury report has been brought on record to support the allegation as levelled in the FIR. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners are in custody since 27.09.2023 and have six criminal antecedents.

¶19

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case the period of custody undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

¶21

Let the petitioners be released on bail, after framing of charge, if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16582 of 2024(2) dt.13-03-2024 3/3

¶23

the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Janta Bazar P.S. case No. 100 of 2023.

¶24

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶25

Alok Verma/-

¶26

U T

Ankit Singh @ Ankit Kumar Rai v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ankit Singh @ Ankit Kumar Rai v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Parkash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rana Pratap Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Saurav Kumar @ Saurav Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Aniket Kumar @ Aniket Aryan Vs The State of Bihar

Satyam Anand @ Satyam Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rajesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar