Dismissed
Sachin Kumar Soni @ Sachin Kumar Sonu v. the State of Bihar
Patna HCCR. MISC./16403/2024
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16403 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-682 Year-2023 Thana- ARA NAGAR District- Bhojpur
======================================================
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP ======================================================
... ... Opposite Party/s
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER
2 14-03-2024 Heard Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned Counsel for the
petitioners and Mr. Bharat Bhushan, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Ara Town P.S. Case No. 682 of 2023 for the offence registered under sections 188, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code lodged on 22.08.2023 by the informant, Shailendra Kumar Yadav.
3. As per the prosecution story lodged by the Circle Officer, Sadar, Ara relating to Khata No.-122 (under P.S. No.239 in the village Murshidpur), there was complete ban on the sale purchase and the same was informed to the Registration Officer. However, interpolating the Khata, Khesra, earlier Shashi lata Jain, Shreyans Jain and Suchita Jain transferred it to the another set of accused persons Shri Shankar Kumar Gupta, Mamta Devi, Sachin Kumar Soni and Sunny Kumar Gupta who in turn again sold it to Amarnath Kesri, Roop Narayan Yadav,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16403 of 2024(2) dt.14-03-2024 2/2
Kamlesh Pandey and Satyendra Pandey again with wrong Khata No. Once the current purchaser started construction work, the same was stopped by the Government official whereafter this fact emerged followed by the FIR.
4. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submit that they are the affected parties, having purchased the land from Shashi lata Jain, Shreyans Jain and Suchita Jain after losing the money.
5. Learned APP for the State, on the other hand, points out that contrary to the submissions so made, in view of the fact the plot numbers were forged, instead of going for mutation, they in turn sold the land to Amarnath Kesri, Roop Narayan Yadav, Kamlesh Pandey and Satyendra Pandey only whereafter this forgery came to light.
6. Considering the kind of allegation that has come against these two petitioners, it would be appropriate that they seek bail.
7. Cr. Misc. No. 16403 of 2024 stands rejected.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Neha/-
U T
Sachin Kumar Soni @ Sachin Kumar Sonu & Sunny Kumar Gupta
The State of Bihar
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court